Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29391 - 29400 of 83395 for case search.
Search results 29391 - 29400 of 83395 for case search.
State v. Lisimba L. Love
2005 WI 116 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2003AP2255 Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18972 - 2005-07-11
2005 WI 116 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2003AP2255 Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18972 - 2005-07-11
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Commission Respondents' Motion for Clarification of Opinion and Order as it Relates to Recall and Special Elections
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0315commrespondentsmotion.pdf - 2024-03-15
STATE OF WISCONSIN I N S U P R E M E C O U R T ____________ Case No. 2023AP1399-OA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0315commrespondentsmotion.pdf - 2024-03-15
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 20-03 - Comments from Counsel for Speaker of the WI State Assembly Robin Voss and Majority Leader of the WI State Senate Scott Fitzgerald
. Among its key features, the proposed rule (1) defines when a case is ripe; (2) expressly provides
/supreme/docs/2003commentsvos.pdf - 2020-12-07
. Among its key features, the proposed rule (1) defines when a case is ripe; (2) expressly provides
/supreme/docs/2003commentsvos.pdf - 2020-12-07
State v. Howard S. Cleaves
reflected the applicable law and the facts of this case. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4970 - 2005-03-31
reflected the applicable law and the facts of this case. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4970 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jay B. Stephany
a question of law, as the facts underpinning the case are undisputed. See State v. Big John, 146 Wis.2d 741
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, as the facts underpinning the case are undisputed. See State v. Big John, 146 Wis.2d 741
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Blodgett
subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12416 - 2005-03-31
subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12416 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pastori M. Balele
in the case are not part of the instant record, though both parties refer us generally to briefs and other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
in the case are not part of the instant record, though both parties refer us generally to briefs and other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31