Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 83206 for case code.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 83206 for case code.
State v. Maurice C.
agrees with the trial court. This case involves a question of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13677 - 2005-03-31
agrees with the trial court. This case involves a question of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13677 - 2005-03-31
Dennis G. Ohlson v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
or rendering your property useless. If this staircase has to go to code, with 40 square feet only of decking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11655 - 2005-03-31
or rendering your property useless. If this staircase has to go to code, with 40 square feet only of decking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11655 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted case 2016AP601; added decisions in 2014AP2498
of its permit without a contested case hearing. (See Wis. Stat. § 30.03 and Wis. Admin. Code § NR
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213608 - 2018-05-29
of its permit without a contested case hearing. (See Wis. Stat. § 30.03 and Wis. Admin. Code § NR
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213608 - 2018-05-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DWD 40.02(25), which provides that a “serial family payer” is “a payer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30513 - 2014-09-15
WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DWD 40.02(25), which provides that a “serial family payer” is “a payer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30513 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
as a serial family child support payer under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 40.02(25), which provides that a “serial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30513 - 2007-10-03
as a serial family child support payer under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 40.02(25), which provides that a “serial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30513 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
As an initial matter, the respondent argues that certiorari review is not available in this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34526 - 2008-11-05
As an initial matter, the respondent argues that certiorari review is not available in this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34526 - 2008-11-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not available in this case because Robinson served his certiorari petition on the warden rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34526 - 2014-09-15
is not available in this case because Robinson served his certiorari petition on the warden rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34526 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Clarence 2X Price v. Ken Morgan
properly available to Price in this case. We agree with the State that Price cannot challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10172 - 2017-09-19
properly available to Price in this case. We agree with the State that Price cannot challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10172 - 2017-09-19
Clarence 2X Price v. Ken Morgan
. The State argues that habeas corpus was not a remedy properly available to Price in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
. The State argues that habeas corpus was not a remedy properly available to Price in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
. Adm. Code § DOC 303.78(2), and wishes to preserve the issue for purposes of judicial review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
. Adm. Code § DOC 303.78(2), and wishes to preserve the issue for purposes of judicial review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31