Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 6245 for cf.

[PDF] NOTICE
was marital property. Cf. Knafelc v. Dain Bosworth, Inc., 224 Wis. 2d 346, 355, 591 N.W.2d 611 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45677 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Johnny Russo
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0726-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-00627 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6281 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] William J. Evers v. John A. Hager
, State v. Evers, Outagamie Circuit Court file No. 87-CF-120, convicting Evers of numerous counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9687 - 2017-09-19

John Doe 67C v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
by supreme court precedent); cf. Hutto v. Davis, 454 U.S. 370, 372–375 (1982) (judicial hierarchy requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6525 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roosevelt Bennett
. Appeal No. 02-0295-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99 CF 2901 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Nagawicka Bay Sailing Club Owners Association, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
by it would interfere with public rights by threatening the surrounding environment. Cf. id. at 720-22, 556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11499 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as an “inventory.” ¶11 An “account” is not an “inventory.” See WIS. STAT. ch. 862 (“Probate—Accounts”); cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758905 - 2024-02-06

COURT OF APPEALS
without losing them.” Allen cites no authority prohibiting such provisions. Cf. Monarch Coaches, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49476 - 2010-05-03

State v. Aaron O. Schreiber
. No. 99-CF-497 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4049 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tammy L. Beier
. Appeal No. 01-0775-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-325 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3753 - 2005-03-31