Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 6253 for cf.

COURT OF APPEALS
which a reasonable jury could infer that Royce knew of the high groundwater problem. Cf. Harman v. La
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44424 - 2009-12-14

[PDF] State v. Thomas H. Bush
in the face of equally plausible evidence to the contrary. Cf. State v. Dunn, 121 Wis.2d 389, 398, 359 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13315 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ritchie H. Dumer
the merits of those arguments. Cf. State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis.2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7721 - 2017-09-19

State v. Norman L. Malone
. Appeal No. 02-0619-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00 CF 1562 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5010 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
meritorious basis for relief. Cf. State v. Francis, 2005 WI App 161, ¶¶22, 26-27, 285 Wis. 2d 451, 701 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032713 - 2025-11-04

Beverly Halverson v. PDQ Food Stores, Inc.
on the materials before the trial court on summary judgment. Cf. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. D-Mart Food Stores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14531 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph F. Cole-Bey
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-3180-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-1011 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4637 - 2017-09-19

Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
be returned to the committee for further consideration. Cf. Gray Well Drilling Co. v. State Bd. of Health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12029 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
was marital property. Cf. Knafelc v. Dain Bosworth, Inc., 224 Wis. 2d 346, 355, 591 N.W.2d 611 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45677 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a valid transfer. This court will not adopt such a definition. Cf. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86700 - 2012-09-04