Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 29942 for des.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 29942 for des.
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
. The allocation of the burden of proof is a question of law, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20
. The allocation of the burden of proof is a question of law, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7495 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 623 N.W.2d 106
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
is reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 623 N.W.2d 106
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29202 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Estate of Brown v. Mathy Const. Co., 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242472 - 2019-06-20
. § 802.08(2). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Estate of Brown v. Mathy Const. Co., 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242472 - 2019-06-20
Susan Schindelholz v. Joseph Vincenti
the application of a statute to a set of undisputed facts, and thus is subject to our de novo review. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
the application of a statute to a set of undisputed facts, and thus is subject to our de novo review. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7336 - 2005-03-31
State v. Camille N. Skotnicki
restitution in the first instance, given a particular set of facts, is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15921 - 2005-03-31
restitution in the first instance, given a particular set of facts, is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15921 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
requires us to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31
requires us to apply constitutional principles to the facts, a matter of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31
Joe M. Janz v. Wisconsin State Labor and Industry Review Commission
, due weight, or no weight (de novo review). Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 659-60, 539
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20423 - 2006-02-13
, due weight, or no weight (de novo review). Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 659-60, 539
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20423 - 2006-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Kris A. Westberg
facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5572 - 2017-09-19
facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5572 - 2017-09-19