Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 20930 for word.
Search results 2941 - 2950 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16947 - 2017-09-21
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1240 Cir. Ct. No. 1988FA73
omitted). In other words, as the circuit court noted in its decision, the date of accrual of a cause
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80350 - 2014-09-15
omitted). In other words, as the circuit court noted in its decision, the date of accrual of a cause
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80350 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Baker
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20
Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
.) ¶8 Kreuser does not dispute that, at least in theory, the words of the Restatement could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2629 - 2005-03-31
.) ¶8 Kreuser does not dispute that, at least in theory, the words of the Restatement could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that the words “went to” and “attended” permit only a single inference, specifically, that Sheppard-Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208596 - 2018-02-20
, that the words “went to” and “attended” permit only a single inference, specifically, that Sheppard-Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208596 - 2018-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meaning of the word contact is some element of interaction, whether physical or verbal.” Contact which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78450 - 2014-09-15
meaning of the word contact is some element of interaction, whether physical or verbal.” Contact which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78450 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
common thread among [all three] definitions and the commonly understood meaning of the word contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2012-02-28
common thread among [all three] definitions and the commonly understood meaning of the word contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2012-02-28
State v. Jason R. Sigmon
was incorrect in two respects. First, the adequacy of a plea colloquy is judged by the words of the colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21071 - 2006-01-25
was incorrect in two respects. First, the adequacy of a plea colloquy is judged by the words of the colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21071 - 2006-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Baker
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17017 - 2017-09-21
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17017 - 2017-09-21