Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29401 - 29410 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 29401 - 29410 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
relief. He served his sentence and the case was closed. ¶3 Over five years later, on May 25, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32770 - 2014-09-15
relief. He served his sentence and the case was closed. ¶3 Over five years later, on May 25, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32770 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the testimony of the ongoing case manager and the dispositional orders entered as exhibits. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439047 - 2021-10-12
the testimony of the ongoing case manager and the dispositional orders entered as exhibits. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439047 - 2021-10-12
State v. John R. Martin
from six cases which were disposed of by a single plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, John R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2005-03-31
from six cases which were disposed of by a single plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, John R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Trisha M. Liethen v. Stephen W. Allen
by public policy. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion, and affirm. ¶2 The underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25343 - 2017-09-21
by public policy. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion, and affirm. ¶2 The underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25343 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the doctrine of issue preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17
on the doctrine of issue preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
jurisdiction, but ultimately dismissed the case, explaining the court lacked procedures to resolve the matter
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368630 - 2021-05-17
jurisdiction, but ultimately dismissed the case, explaining the court lacked procedures to resolve the matter
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368630 - 2021-05-17
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Joy DeRone
guilty of violating the ordinance. In ordinance cases, the County is required to prove by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10551 - 2017-09-20
guilty of violating the ordinance. In ordinance cases, the County is required to prove by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10551 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an extension of time to name experts effectively dismissed the plaintiffs’ case. The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74400 - 2014-09-15
of an extension of time to name experts effectively dismissed the plaintiffs’ case. The circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74400 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
of in the three underlying cases and in the original sentences is not relevant to this appeal. Suffice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19
of in the three underlying cases and in the original sentences is not relevant to this appeal. Suffice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2409 - 2017-09-19