Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29401 - 29410 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 29401 - 29410 of 83344 for case search.
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4656 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
Avco Financial Services v. Susanne Musgrove
.[1] This is a small claims garnishment case in which the garnishee defendant, Brian Musgrove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15164 - 2005-03-31
.[1] This is a small claims garnishment case in which the garnishee defendant, Brian Musgrove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15164 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard J. Wooster
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B. Sentencing Discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8229 - 2005-03-31
Sherry Mulligan v. Barbara J. Koehler
appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10417 - 2005-03-31
appealed the September 28, 1994, judgment to this court in case number 94-2532. Ultimately that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Blodgett
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
. An Intoxilyzer test subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
Timothy G. Wolff v. Roger M. Coates
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31
commissioner heard the case on July 6, 1998, and orally granted judgment to the Wolffs in the amount of $1601
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15326 - 2005-03-31