Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29401 - 29410 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 29401 - 29410 of 83395 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with setting the fire in Harris’s apartment and with burglarizing the duplex. The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38605 - 2009-08-03
was charged with setting the fire in Harris’s apartment and with burglarizing the duplex. The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38605 - 2009-08-03
WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP320 Complete Title of ...
2013 WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP320 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95146 - 2013-05-28
2013 WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP320 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95146 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
State v. James Held
to a responsible adult. ¶5 Acknowledging that the case was a “close call,” the trial court ruled that Friedl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
to a responsible adult. ¶5 Acknowledging that the case was a “close call,” the trial court ruled that Friedl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert D. Stewart
, the State ultimately conceded that Stewart’s refusal was proper. The case was scheduled for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
, the State ultimately conceded that Stewart’s refusal was proper. The case was scheduled for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
situated for sentencing purposes: Staten’s codefendants had fewer prior convictions, fewer open cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
situated for sentencing purposes: Staten’s codefendants had fewer prior convictions, fewer open cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly concluded that the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43493 - 2014-09-15
it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly concluded that the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43493 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
liability. Stanford argues that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case because public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21
liability. Stanford argues that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case because public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in Harris’s apartment and with burglarizing the duplex. The case proceeded to trial. On the morning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38605 - 2014-09-15
in Harris’s apartment and with burglarizing the duplex. The case proceeded to trial. On the morning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
2001 WI App 215 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3390-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 215 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3390-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
2003 WI App 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4990 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4990 - 2017-09-19