Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29411 - 29420 of 40302 for financial disclosure statements.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, that Talley’s statement after a polygraph was the only evidence against him at the revocation hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statements to others, the circuit court recognized that the only person identified as touching Devin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467611 - 2021-12-28

COURT OF APPEALS
§ 67:8 (4th ed. 2008) (“Under the statute, the condemnor must send to the owner … an itemized statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35963 - 2009-03-23

[PDF] WI APP 93
. 1992) (we may decline to review arguments that are supported only by general statements and that cite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179028 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
and asked him if it was a picture of him. Kirpatrick nodded affirmatively, but refused to sign a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28487 - 2007-03-19

Linda L. Greene v. Richard V. Hahn
. A major factor in this recommendation was Adam’s statement to the guardian ad litem that he would leave St
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7125 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statements in the PSI concerning his sexual addiction, the State argued that Sprague’s risk to the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20

[PDF] State v. Steven A. Avery
entirely on a review of undisputed statements contained in the record.... “When the principal facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 100
here, the exclusive means of judicial review of the validity of a rule or unpromulgated statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66046 - 2014-09-15

Lisa K. Alberte v. Anew Health Care Services, Inc.
statement that “Congress’ decision to define ‘employer’ to include any ‘agent’ of an employer, 42 U.S.C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17179 - 2005-03-31