Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29421 - 29430 of 83350 for case search.
Search results 29421 - 29430 of 83350 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
by the trial court. The trial court then “[a]djourned” the case. ¶5 On March 31, 2003, eighty-seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in cases where the mortgaged premises sell for less than the amount due and to become due on the mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97056 - 2013-05-20
in cases where the mortgaged premises sell for less than the amount due and to become due on the mortgage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97056 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
Village of Menomonee Falls v. Bryan Preuss
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0384 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13615 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0384 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13615 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darin W. Baratka
2002 WI App 288 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0770 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 288 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0770 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
State v. James E. Goodman
in this case. After reviewing the briefs, the trial court concluded: There is no question that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25089 - 2006-05-08
in this case. After reviewing the briefs, the trial court concluded: There is no question that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25089 - 2006-05-08
State v. Kyle W.F.
) The county where the juvenile is present. (c) In the case of a violation of state law … the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
) The county where the juvenile is present. (c) In the case of a violation of state law … the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31