Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29421 - 29430 of 62401 for child support.
Search results 29421 - 29430 of 62401 for child support.
State v. William Ray Toles
argues that the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to support the initial seizure of Toles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3710 - 2005-03-31
argues that the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion to support the initial seizure of Toles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3710 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwayne Williams
in his duffel bag. Because the testimony and the facts found by the trial court do not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
in his duffel bag. Because the testimony and the facts found by the trial court do not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
Kathleen J. Larson v. Arlita Furlong
of the evidence would support the proposition that Larson lied about her past and current earnings and earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11384 - 2005-03-31
of the evidence would support the proposition that Larson lied about her past and current earnings and earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11384 - 2005-03-31
Quality Investments, Inc. v. Board of Review of the City of Superior
) there was insufficient evidence to support either the board’s decision or the city assessor’s opinion of the assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4581 - 2005-03-31
) there was insufficient evidence to support either the board’s decision or the city assessor’s opinion of the assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4581 - 2005-03-31
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
Ardyth argues there was no consideration for the note. Whether a contract is supported by consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Ardyth argues there was no consideration for the note. Whether a contract is supported by consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Tito Quixte Grimes
that “[t]here was an insufficient reasoning process in sentencing to support such an extreme conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10539 - 2017-09-20
that “[t]here was an insufficient reasoning process in sentencing to support such an extreme conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10539 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
20 report. When Jones himself testified, he relied on the September 20 report to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51331 - 2014-09-15
20 report. When Jones himself testified, he relied on the September 20 report to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51331 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. Stauffenecker cites criminal cases in support of his claim. Stauffenecker provides no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2014-06-24
hearing. Stauffenecker cites criminal cases in support of his claim. Stauffenecker provides no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2014-06-24
Dane County v. Robert L. Bovee
; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination that Bovee was guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6462 - 2008-04-14
; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination that Bovee was guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6462 - 2008-04-14
Thomas A. Higbee v. Gary L. Higbee, Sr.
are nothing more than a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13745 - 2005-03-31
are nothing more than a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13745 - 2005-03-31