Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29431 - 29440 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
Search results 29431 - 29440 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
area on the Porter lot near Desbrow’s house. ¶4 In 2006, Desbrow filed this action claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
area on the Porter lot near Desbrow’s house. ¶4 In 2006, Desbrow filed this action claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
WI APP 139
immediately upon the request of the buyer, but is a condition precedent to recovering on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33627 - 2014-09-15
immediately upon the request of the buyer, but is a condition precedent to recovering on a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33627 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Grieger further contends the court erroneously dismissed his claim that Smithfield Beef Group-Green Bay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63428 - 2011-05-02
. Grieger further contends the court erroneously dismissed his claim that Smithfield Beef Group-Green Bay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63428 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Behm
., because the parties agreed to characterize it as a first offense.2 Behm claims that these first two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
., because the parties agreed to characterize it as a first offense.2 Behm claims that these first two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the claim. Id. at 651-52 (citations omitted). ¶8 The State does not dispute Beahm’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
of the claim. Id. at 651-52 (citations omitted). ¶8 The State does not dispute Beahm’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and the trial. We agree with the trial court’s rejection of these claims, so we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132255 - 2014-12-29
and the trial. We agree with the trial court’s rejection of these claims, so we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132255 - 2014-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that Griffin’s pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237309 - 2019-03-11
. There is no arguable merit to a claim that Griffin’s pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237309 - 2019-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the assessment of mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218670 - 2018-09-04
. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the assessment of mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218670 - 2018-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
staked out the location and arrested Stern. The jury did not buy Stern’s claim that he had intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92443 - 2014-09-15
staked out the location and arrested Stern. The jury did not buy Stern’s claim that he had intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92443 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
letter to this court raising concerns about access to his client file, which he claimed he needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971583 - 2025-06-18
letter to this court raising concerns about access to his client file, which he claimed he needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971583 - 2025-06-18