Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29441 - 29450 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 29441 - 29450 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for judgment or discretion. The County directs our attention to Ottinger. The plaintiff in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
for judgment or discretion. The County directs our attention to Ottinger. The plaintiff in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682549 - 2023-07-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682549 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
jurisdiction, but ultimately dismissed the case, explaining the court lacked procedures to resolve the matter
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368630 - 2021-05-17
jurisdiction, but ultimately dismissed the case, explaining the court lacked procedures to resolve the matter
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368630 - 2021-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenge the joinder of her case with the case in which the children’s father’s parental rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=706593 - 2023-09-26
challenge the joinder of her case with the case in which the children’s father’s parental rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=706593 - 2023-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling in a criminal case was harmless error, it bears the burden of showing beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
ruling in a criminal case was harmless error, it bears the burden of showing beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94600 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
preclusion because, in his parallel case, the federal district court had suppressed evidence (ammunition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie L. Perkins
. The State agrees. This court also agrees and remands the case for resentencing. I. BACKGROUND. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7280 - 2017-09-20
. The State agrees. This court also agrees and remands the case for resentencing. I. BACKGROUND. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7280 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Willie Burnside
to any party or attorney in the case, financial interests in the case, and opinion, bias or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13649 - 2017-09-21
to any party or attorney in the case, financial interests in the case, and opinion, bias or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 48
2007 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28233 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1268
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Kevin O. Harper appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543016 - 2022-07-13
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Kevin O. Harper appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543016 - 2022-07-13