Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29441 - 29450 of 38175 for ph d.
Search results 29441 - 29450 of 38175 for ph d.
WI App 7 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP36-CR Complete Title of...
“conduct a protective search” of a car is “decide[d] on a case-by-case basis, evaluating the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74759 - 2012-01-24
“conduct a protective search” of a car is “decide[d] on a case-by-case basis, evaluating the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74759 - 2012-01-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
was “unreasonable.” Wick further suggests that the officer “ignore[d]” evidence of his inability to hear during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33447 - 2014-09-15
was “unreasonable.” Wick further suggests that the officer “ignore[d]” evidence of his inability to hear during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33447 - 2014-09-15
Mark Miller v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company
The parties agree that the City is an “owner” of “property,” within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 895.52(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5375 - 2005-03-31
The parties agree that the City is an “owner” of “property,” within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 895.52(1)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5375 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy S. Duckart
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: steven d. ebert, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3254 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: steven d. ebert, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3254 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that it “refuse[d] to believe” that the prosecutor was somehow “ditching the airplane” at the end of the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137625 - 2015-03-12
that it “refuse[d] to believe” that the prosecutor was somehow “ditching the airplane” at the end of the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137625 - 2015-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Barron County: MAUREEN D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132761 - 2015-01-12
-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Barron County: MAUREEN D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132761 - 2015-01-12
State v. Dale W. Robinson
. Section 343.305(4)(d). If testing is refused, the officer issues a notice of intent to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11237 - 2005-03-31
. Section 343.305(4)(d). If testing is refused, the officer issues a notice of intent to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11237 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the majority of the facts stated throughout their brief, in violation of Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d)-(1)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35267 - 2009-01-20
for the majority of the facts stated throughout their brief, in violation of Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d)-(1)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35267 - 2009-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Interpretation of statutes is a question of law that this court reviews independently. State v. Aaron D., 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29259 - 2007-06-04
Interpretation of statutes is a question of law that this court reviews independently. State v. Aaron D., 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29259 - 2007-06-04
Patricia M. Ihlenfeldt v. Michael L. Ihlenfeldt
of the parties has substantial assets not subject to division by the court. (d) The contribution of each party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8650 - 2013-04-30
of the parties has substantial assets not subject to division by the court. (d) The contribution of each party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8650 - 2013-04-30