Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29441 - 29450 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 29441 - 29450 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentences. He argues that the trial court’s assessment of his risk of reoffending was not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30278 - 2007-09-17
the sentences. He argues that the trial court’s assessment of his risk of reoffending was not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30278 - 2007-09-17
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
the motion and Sanders appeals. ¶4 Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
the motion and Sanders appeals. ¶4 Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In considering whether to apply this procedural bar, both the appellate and the trial court “must pay close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26879 - 2014-09-15
. In considering whether to apply this procedural bar, both the appellate and the trial court “must pay close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26879 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
without a hearing on Saddler’s claim that trial counsel was No. 2017AP2501-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
without a hearing on Saddler’s claim that trial counsel was No. 2017AP2501-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227135 - 2018-11-13
State v. Luis Aguirre
, the trial court stated and Aguirre said he understood the maximum sentence was eleven years. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18599 - 2005-06-20
, the trial court stated and Aguirre said he understood the maximum sentence was eleven years. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18599 - 2005-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
had no reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed. After testimony and argument, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87422 - 2012-09-25
had no reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed. After testimony and argument, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87422 - 2012-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
, “The trial [was] one-sided, as if pre-determined outcome, based on one side’s information ….” He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112237 - 2014-05-12
, “The trial [was] one-sided, as if pre-determined outcome, based on one side’s information ….” He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112237 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
). The judgment was entered on May 19, 2008, after trial to the court in a proceeding governed by Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35707 - 2009-03-03
). The judgment was entered on May 19, 2008, after trial to the court in a proceeding governed by Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35707 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a bench trial, the circuit court found that the ground was proven and made the requisite finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894298 - 2024-12-26
a bench trial, the circuit court found that the ground was proven and made the requisite finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894298 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. He contends he is entitled to a new trial because the bailiff’s answers to the jury foreperson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87481 - 2012-09-24
motion. He contends he is entitled to a new trial because the bailiff’s answers to the jury foreperson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87481 - 2012-09-24