Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29471 - 29480 of 37897 for d's.

Frontsheet
. For the petitioner there was a brief filed by Colleen D. Ball, Wauwatosa, and oral argument by Colleen D. Ball
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33126 - 2008-06-19

[PDF] WI 83
. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Andrew T. Phillips, Kristen D. DeCato, and Stadler, Centofanti
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33333 - 2014-09-15

Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. State
is granted quashing the subpoena of the John Doe judge. ¶1 PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J. This appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16692 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Waushara County Board of Adjustment
. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Thomas D. Larson and Debra P. Conrad, Madison, on behalf
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16668 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gabriel Derango
-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Warren D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13705 - 2014-09-15

Jim Hilton v. Department of Natural Resources
argument by John A. Kassner. An amicus curiae brief was filed by Thomas D. Larson and Debra P. Conrad
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25788 - 2006-07-05

[PDF] Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. State
writ is granted quashing the subpoena of the John Doe judge. ¶1 PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16692 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert C. Deilke
of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J. The State of Wisconsin requests
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16684 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
we will uphold the trial court’s ruling where it “consider[ed] the relevant facts, applie[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726795 - 2023-11-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)(d), (e). In a situation where an evidentiary issue is not adequately preserved in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774069 - 2024-03-12