Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29481 - 29490 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29481 - 29490 of 97795 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102979 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. ¶17 Given the narrow standard of review, this court is satisfied the jury could form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123444 - 2014-10-06
in this case. ¶17 Given the narrow standard of review, this court is satisfied the jury could form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123444 - 2014-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶10 Ricciardi made a prima facie case for summary judgment, and the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36186 - 2009-04-15
. ¶10 Ricciardi made a prima facie case for summary judgment, and the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36186 - 2009-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the municipal court should have admitted into evidence, and in some manner enforced in this case, two written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101631 - 2013-09-04
that the municipal court should have admitted into evidence, and in some manner enforced in this case, two written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101631 - 2013-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of the scheduled jury trial until Iowa ruled on Melissa’s motion, or to dismiss this case based on the court’s lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45782 - 2010-01-13
of the scheduled jury trial until Iowa ruled on Melissa’s motion, or to dismiss this case based on the court’s lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45782 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
by an expert who testified in this case, as quoted by the circuit court in its decision, “[T]he purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136661 - 2015-03-04
by an expert who testified in this case, as quoted by the circuit court in its decision, “[T]he purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136661 - 2015-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion in a single lawsuit. Royal asserts that in Precision Erecting, this court “favorably cited cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36586 - 2009-05-26
preclusion in a single lawsuit. Royal asserts that in Precision Erecting, this court “favorably cited cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36586 - 2009-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
Batson. The court then found that “there was … not a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2005-03-31
Batson. The court then found that “there was … not a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the Millers nor the court notified Zurich’s attorney of the case’s proceedings. Alternatively, it argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38623 - 2009-07-29
the Millers nor the court notified Zurich’s attorney of the case’s proceedings. Alternatively, it argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38623 - 2009-07-29
[PDF]
WI APP 68
2010 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1669
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49371 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1669
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49371 - 2014-09-15