Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29481 - 29490 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by the secretary for that proposition does not contain any such blanket statement giving sole authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180630 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kathy Schmidt v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
for relying upon Mazanka's own statement that he was not involved in the selection process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7918 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] IW-1711 - Order for Temporary Physical Custody (Secure/Nonsecure) - Indian Child Welfare Act
is optional at this hearing.) See attached Statement of Active Efforts (IW-1609) 3
/formdisplay/IW-1711.pdf?formNumber=IW-1711&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-08-14

[PDF] IW-1791 Permanency Hearing Order - Indian Child Welfare Act
and rehabilitation programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family. See attached Statement of Active
/formdisplay/IW-1791.pdf?formNumber=IW-1791&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-11-20

COURT OF APPEALS
be appropriate but for the statement in the restitution stipulation that “[a]ny restitution payment is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30132 - 2007-08-29

[PDF] State v. Christopher L. Russell
.” The Woehrer court’s statement in full, however, provided: “The lack of an information in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3958 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Gregory Pfaff
was tainted, or the trial court’s statement that it had to declare a mistrial.2 Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15393 - 2017-09-21

Kathy Schmidt v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
for relying upon Mazanka's own statement that he was not involved in the selection process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7918 - 2005-03-31

State v. Antonio V. Henderson
if the released person has violated any condition or rule. DHSS “shall submit a statement showing probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14979 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
false statements or omissions, there was no probable cause for the warrant. Mechtel, 176 Wis. 2d at 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135116 - 2015-02-17