Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29491 - 29500 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29491 - 29500 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
charged with escape.[2] He did not appeal from his conviction. In 2007, he filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34574 - 2008-11-17
charged with escape.[2] He did not appeal from his conviction. In 2007, he filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34574 - 2008-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to dismiss. After a hearing at which VanWormer did not appear, the court granted a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163750 - 2017-09-21
motion to dismiss. After a hearing at which VanWormer did not appear, the court granted a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
preserved for appellate review because no postconviction motion was filed raising it. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163996 - 2017-09-21
preserved for appellate review because no postconviction motion was filed raising it. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163996 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a crime, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Attorney Marcella De Peters filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195139 - 2017-09-21
to a crime, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Attorney Marcella De Peters filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493440 - 2022-03-16
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493440 - 2022-03-16
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
revocation and from another order denying his postconviction motion.[1] We affirm because it does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2014-12-08
revocation and from another order denying his postconviction motion.[1] We affirm because it does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2014-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2019AP2320 3 Destiney’s motion for partial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=487737 - 2022-02-22
are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2019AP2320 3 Destiney’s motion for partial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=487737 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Sturgeon
-2885-CR 4 ¶7 Sturgeon then filed a motion to suppress his confession, contending that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14596 - 2017-09-21
-2885-CR 4 ¶7 Sturgeon then filed a motion to suppress his confession, contending that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14596 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment granting Wells Fargo’s motion for summary judgment in Wells Fargo’s action to foreclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100808 - 2013-08-14
judgment granting Wells Fargo’s motion for summary judgment in Wells Fargo’s action to foreclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100808 - 2013-08-14
[PDF]
Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah (Kahn) v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the defendants’ motion and dismissed Casteel’s complaint. We affirm. BACKGROUND This is the second time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14667 - 2017-09-21
the defendants’ motion and dismissed Casteel’s complaint. We affirm. BACKGROUND This is the second time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14667 - 2017-09-21