Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29491 - 29500 of 82986 for simple case.
Search results 29491 - 29500 of 82986 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Olsen
to go through the case with you and look at the weaknesses of the case? [Olsen]: No. [Prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
to go through the case with you and look at the weaknesses of the case? [Olsen]: No. [Prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary F. Boettcher
that this is not a Welsh case since Boettcher gave police consent to enter. We affirm. No. 95-0832-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8821 - 2017-09-19
that this is not a Welsh case since Boettcher gave police consent to enter. We affirm. No. 95-0832-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8821 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Display Promotions, Inc. v. DoveBid Valuation Services, Inc.
. ¶10 On reconsideration, the court concluded that the facts of this case do not fall under Costa v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19397 - 2017-09-21
. ¶10 On reconsideration, the court concluded that the facts of this case do not fall under Costa v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19397 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118835 - 2014-07-30
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118835 - 2014-07-30
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Douglas A. Logemann
engaged in an analysis of the same issue raised in this case. We held that the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2912 - 2017-09-19
engaged in an analysis of the same issue raised in this case. We held that the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2912 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
the circumstances of the case and counsel's conduct and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances of the case and counsel's conduct and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
State v. Janice D.
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6780 - 2005-03-31
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6780 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a sentence modification pursuant to two United States Supreme Court cases, Apprendi v. New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
is entitled to a sentence modification pursuant to two United States Supreme Court cases, Apprendi v. New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27