Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 15244 for 2013.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 15244 for 2013.
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[2] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[2] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
CA Blank Order
on December 16, 2013, and he was ultimately arrested for OWI. Wilczynski filed a suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141771 - 2015-05-18
on December 16, 2013, and he was ultimately arrested for OWI. Wilczynski filed a suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141771 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (2013-14). An adequate factual basis supported the conviction. The record shows the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21
) (2013-14). An adequate factual basis supported the conviction. The record shows the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT II April 17, 2013 To: Hon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95287 - 2014-09-15
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT II April 17, 2013 To: Hon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95287 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141956 - 2017-09-21
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141956 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157983 - 2017-09-21
809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Bridges’ appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181566 - 2017-09-21
. Bridges’ appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181566 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
a thorough no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137409 - 2015-03-17
a thorough no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137409 - 2015-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159272 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159272 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and Gundrum, JJ. Thomas P. Vitrano appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140030 - 2015-04-21
and Gundrum, JJ. Thomas P. Vitrano appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2013-14)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140030 - 2015-04-21