Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 68326 for did.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 68326 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record that he or she did not know or understand some aspect of the right to counsel or the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51517 - 2010-06-30
of the record that he or she did not know or understand some aspect of the right to counsel or the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51517 - 2010-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), arguing that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111776 - 2014-05-06
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), arguing that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111776 - 2014-05-06
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
Court entered into by his attorney of record. Ardell argues that because he did not sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
Court entered into by his attorney of record. Ardell argues that because he did not sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
[PDF]
State v. William H. Warren
to pause for four or five seconds before he could finish. Although Warren claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19
to pause for four or five seconds before he could finish. Although Warren claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19
State v. Harry S. Bernstein
conclude Bernstein did consent to the trial to the court, and that § 980.05(2) does not require a personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
conclude Bernstein did consent to the trial to the court, and that § 980.05(2) does not require a personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. DeGracie
DeGracie had notice but did not participate, the referee granted the OLR's motion for default judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16664 - 2005-03-31
DeGracie had notice but did not participate, the referee granted the OLR's motion for default judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Walter P. VanDeMortel
) probable cause for his arrest did not exist; (2) even if the arrest were valid, he was no longer in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13969 - 2005-03-31
) probable cause for his arrest did not exist; (2) even if the arrest were valid, he was no longer in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13969 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carlton B. Campbell
at arraignment. We conclude the amendment did not violate § 973.12(1). We also conclude that Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9503 - 2017-09-19
at arraignment. We conclude the amendment did not violate § 973.12(1). We also conclude that Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9503 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but stated that he did not put it into her vagina. The sister told a sexual assault nurse that D.G. put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253156 - 2020-02-05
but stated that he did not put it into her vagina. The sister told a sexual assault nurse that D.G. put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253156 - 2020-02-05
State v. William H. Warren
finish. Although Warren claimed that he did not understand the test, the officer believed that Warren
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9982 - 2005-03-31
finish. Although Warren claimed that he did not understand the test, the officer believed that Warren
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9982 - 2005-03-31