Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2951 - 2960 of 20931 for word.

[PDF] State v. Ryan E. Baker
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7347 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Ryan E. Baker
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
standard, however, is a suggestion that we ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16969 - 2017-09-21

Molly K. Borreson v. Craig J. Yunto
and unreasonably denied the petitioner” physical placement.[3] The use of the word “shall” generally indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24570 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] Michael F. Hupy & Associates v. Michael T. Savaglio
promise that Hupy was to “receive forty percent of the fee on the Hardison case” into words without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5002 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or parents … of the information specified under sub. (1). In other words, § 48.356(2) requires any written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142876 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 119
of these provisions, “[c]ourts should give priority to the plain meaning of the words of [the] provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37172 - 2009-08-25

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
in Gritzner v. Michael R., 228 Wis. 2d 541, 598 N.W.2d 282 (Ct. App. 1999). 5 “The use of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19

Michelle Ennis v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company
with the well-established rule that words or phrases in an insurance policy are ambiguous if, when read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13900 - 2005-03-31