Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29501 - 29510 of 83367 for case search.
Search results 29501 - 29510 of 83367 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Fuerst, 181 Wis. 2d 903, 915, 512 N.W.2d 243 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶4 In this case, the court warned Sims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27403 - 2014-09-15
. Fuerst, 181 Wis. 2d 903, 915, 512 N.W.2d 243 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶4 In this case, the court warned Sims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
. In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, therefore it is only necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
. In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, therefore it is only necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darin W. Baratka
2002 WI App 288 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 288 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this case to effectively revive the appeal they voluntarily dismissed in the prior case or to otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350865 - 2021-03-30
this case to effectively revive the appeal they voluntarily dismissed in the prior case or to otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350865 - 2021-03-30
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confidentiality, we use pseudonyms for the child and parent in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020740 - 2025-10-14
confidentiality, we use pseudonyms for the child and parent in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020740 - 2025-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
(collectively “Zimmerman”) appeal an order regarding an award of attorney fees in a “lemon law” case. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76071 - 2012-02-20
State v. Lisimba L. Love
2005 WI 116 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2003AP2255 Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18972 - 2005-07-11
2005 WI 116 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2003AP2255 Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18972 - 2005-07-11