Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29501 - 29510 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
Search results 29501 - 29510 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
State v. Lasko W. Jackson
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 939.05.1 Jackson claims: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2228 - 2017-09-19
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 939.05.1 Jackson claims: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
56, 61, 117 N.W.2d 614 (1962). Schneiker Concrete claims the safe-place instruction was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37948 - 2014-09-15
56, 61, 117 N.W.2d 614 (1962). Schneiker Concrete claims the safe-place instruction was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William Medina
postconviction relief. He claims: (1) that his criminal prosecution, which followed prison discipline related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13376 - 2017-09-21
postconviction relief. He claims: (1) that his criminal prosecution, which followed prison discipline related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
federal sentence, rather than consecutively. He claimed the circuit court was not fully aware of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
federal sentence, rather than consecutively. He claimed the circuit court was not fully aware of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to these consolidated appeals. For purposes of Ramage’s claim for sentence credit, the facts comprising those histories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
to these consolidated appeals. For purposes of Ramage’s claim for sentence credit, the facts comprising those histories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
State v. James F. Blasky
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and (5) whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and (5) whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl R. Kramer
The essential facts concerning Kramer’s selective prosecution claim are undisputed. Kramer owned and operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
The essential facts concerning Kramer’s selective prosecution claim are undisputed. Kramer owned and operated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
inability to produce the car’s registration as well as Moore’s contradictory claims that he was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38346 - 2014-09-15
inability to produce the car’s registration as well as Moore’s contradictory claims that he was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38346 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a restitution award, claiming that because the State focused on the lack of written contract for the garage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90981 - 2014-09-15
a restitution award, claiming that because the State focused on the lack of written contract for the garage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90981 - 2014-09-15