Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29521 - 29530 of 97737 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29521 - 29530 of 97737 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
to manipulate the system. Again, the circuit court denied Cortez’s motion. ¶7 Ultimately, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101875 - 2013-09-17
to manipulate the system. Again, the circuit court denied Cortez’s motion. ¶7 Ultimately, the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101875 - 2013-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41970 - 2009-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41970 - 2009-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
In 2009, CAM commenced a bankruptcy case. The bankruptcy trustee sought court approval to liquidate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141345 - 2015-05-12
In 2009, CAM commenced a bankruptcy case. The bankruptcy trustee sought court approval to liquidate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141345 - 2015-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 1, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 1, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115772 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, in this case the jury, and not this court, is charged with resolving conflicts in testimony and weighing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105835 - 2013-12-18
, in this case the jury, and not this court, is charged with resolving conflicts in testimony and weighing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105835 - 2013-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
during the State’s case-in-chief. The parties agreed, and the trial court ruled, however, that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52097 - 2010-07-14
during the State’s case-in-chief. The parties agreed, and the trial court ruled, however, that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52097 - 2010-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
as party to a crime. The charges arose from two Lincoln County Circuit Court cases that were resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86027 - 2012-08-13
as party to a crime. The charges arose from two Lincoln County Circuit Court cases that were resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86027 - 2012-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
; the court also noted that Lisiecki’s motion had not been timely filed. ¶5 The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29763 - 2007-07-18
; the court also noted that Lisiecki’s motion had not been timely filed. ¶5 The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29763 - 2007-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
unit located above the Seegers’ unit. The court case proceedings spanned three days, during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13
unit located above the Seegers’ unit. The court case proceedings spanned three days, during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61909 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61909 - 2011-03-28