Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29521 - 29530 of 64078 for records/1000.
Search results 29521 - 29530 of 64078 for records/1000.
[PDF]
WI APP 140
for that calendar year. DHFS audited Meda-Care’s 2002 records and concluded that it had overpaid Meda-Care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28681 - 2014-09-15
for that calendar year. DHFS audited Meda-Care’s 2002 records and concluded that it had overpaid Meda-Care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28681 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Act, and any property acquired after the agreement would belong to the record owner. The agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33265 - 2008-06-30
Act, and any property acquired after the agreement would belong to the record owner. The agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33265 - 2008-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record and where the court’s decision not to impose a risk reduction sentence was based on an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
by the record and where the court’s decision not to impose a risk reduction sentence was based on an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
Mary C. Volker v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
for sanctions against the guardian under § 802.05(1)(a), Stats. Because the record supports the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8236 - 2005-03-31
for sanctions against the guardian under § 802.05(1)(a), Stats. Because the record supports the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
. The Record In This Case Does Not Support A Finding That Shata Was Prejudiced
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/shata.pdf - 2015-04-12
. The Record In This Case Does Not Support A Finding That Shata Was Prejudiced
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/shata.pdf - 2015-04-12
[PDF]
Frontsheet
in the audiovisual recording was inconsistent with the officer's testimony; specifically, that the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192412 - 2017-09-27
in the audiovisual recording was inconsistent with the officer's testimony; specifically, that the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192412 - 2017-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire records, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
independently reviewing the entire records, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Terry G. Seitz
, and that omission is fatal to his appeal. ¶4 The supreme court has explained that when “[t]he record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6385 - 2017-09-19
, and that omission is fatal to his appeal. ¶4 The supreme court has explained that when “[t]he record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6385 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103463 - 2013-10-22
the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103463 - 2013-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
“the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief….” Id. at 309-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36048 - 2009-04-07
“the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief….” Id. at 309-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36048 - 2009-04-07