Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29531 - 29540 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 29531 - 29540 of 64077 for records/1000.
State v. Stephanie B. Holmes
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11609 - 2005-03-31
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106237 - 2017-09-21
property. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cornell Clark
the officers’ and could have been anticipated based on the officers’ reports. The record provides no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
the officers’ and could have been anticipated based on the officers’ reports. The record provides no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16218 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) to pertinent portions of the record and the application of governing legal authority, and I reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146733 - 2015-08-19
) to pertinent portions of the record and the application of governing legal authority, and I reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146733 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141808 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141808 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139106 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139106 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy V. Montgomery
.” State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). The record here reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20547 - 2005-12-12
.” State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 501, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). The record here reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20547 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543017 - 2022-07-13
consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543017 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Michael Goldsmith
there was proof of Goldsmith's repeater status in the record, we affirm imposition of the enhanced sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7938 - 2017-09-19
there was proof of Goldsmith's repeater status in the record, we affirm imposition of the enhanced sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7938 - 2017-09-19