Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29551 - 29560 of 51576 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. Grant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204771 - 2017-12-07

COURT OF APPEALS
was illegally arrested and that his trial lawyer did not effectively assist him when he was convicted of armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83976 - 2012-07-11

96-01 SCR 20:8:5 - Jurisdiction in Disciplinary Proceedings
in the matter. IT IS ORDERED that, effective the date of this order, Supreme Court Rule 20:8.5 is repealed
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1215 - 2005-03-31

96-01 SCR 20:8:5 - Jurisdiction in Disciplinary Proceedings
in the matter. IT IS ORDERED that, effective the date of this order, Supreme Court Rule 20:8.5 is repealed
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1043 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 96-01 SCR 20:8:5 - Jurisdiction in Disciplinary Proceedings
in the matter. IT IS ORDERED that, effective the date of this order, Supreme Court Rule 20:8.5
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
the request to modify the sentence, stressing the seriousness of the offenses and their effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28978 - 2007-05-14

[PDF] State v. Douglas Parks
suspicion to effect an investigative stop, the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rule Order
matter without a public hearing. Wis. S. Ct. IOP III.A. Therefore, effective the date of this order
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137111 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 25
pursuant to this order shall be effective as of July 1, 2017, and shall apply to proceedings commenced
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186714 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Shawn Schulpius
effect of No. 00-0095 3 the United States Supreme Court's decision in Seling v. Young
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21