Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29551 - 29560 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Cameron D.
the public. He claimed that releasing any information would have negative consequences for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24629 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was convicted in March 2005. ¶2 In 2013, Lamb sought to withdraw his pleas. He claimed it was not he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110014 - 2014-04-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the defendant’s claims in a decision and order dated April 17, 2017.” While Kennedy had claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232871 - 2019-01-14

State v. Brian K. Schessler
had discovered new evidence in support of his claim that he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25828 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
there is any arguable merit to a claim challenging the sentence imposed; and whether the court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244067 - 2019-07-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the underlying motion and amended motion to vacate judgment, claiming that extraordinary circumstances existed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123442 - 2017-09-21

Jana Paulson v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
to save the St. Croix River’s natural splendor. Paulson claimed that the bluff-line and lot-line setbacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12959 - 2005-03-31

Jacqueline A. Langendorf v. T.D.H. Manufacturing, Inc.
to production worker status. She claims that T.D.H. breached this agreement by her discharge. T.D.H. argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in the contract required that Baumgartner bring her claims in California. Baumgartner’s briefs focus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190911 - 2017-09-21

June Remick v. James D. Cady
to be the custodian of the cremated remains of James Wrosch (Wrosch or the decedent). The next of kin claim the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16332 - 2005-03-31