Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29551 - 29560 of 38182 for ph d.
Search results 29551 - 29560 of 38182 for ph d.
State v. Gregory L. Hoover
that any error here was harmless, we need not address Hoover’s contention further. D. Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31
that any error here was harmless, we need not address Hoover’s contention further. D. Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was “surprise[d]” when Dr. Kumar and the Fund “unilaterally cancelled” Dr. Lewan’s scheduled deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
was “surprise[d]” when Dr. Kumar and the Fund “unilaterally cancelled” Dr. Lewan’s scheduled deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to the marriage, § 767.61(3)(d), and, more particularly, “each party’s efforts to preserve marital assets.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56375 - 2010-11-09
to the marriage, § 767.61(3)(d), and, more particularly, “each party’s efforts to preserve marital assets.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56375 - 2010-11-09
07AP2584 Robert Zellner v. Daryl Herrick
(d), http://www.fmcs.gov/internet/itemDetail.asp?categoryID=197&itemID=16959 (last visited Nov. 7
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34696 - 2008-11-25
(d), http://www.fmcs.gov/internet/itemDetail.asp?categoryID=197&itemID=16959 (last visited Nov. 7
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34696 - 2008-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: BENJAMIN D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73888 - 2011-11-14
-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: BENJAMIN D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73888 - 2011-11-14
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
thereafter.” Section 343.305(9)(d). A revocation is effective “immediately upon a final determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
thereafter.” Section 343.305(9)(d). A revocation is effective “immediately upon a final determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
State v. Warren A. Goodman
of witnesses “indicate[d] that [his counsel] was not sufficiently prepared for trial.” He alleged that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
of witnesses “indicate[d] that [his counsel] was not sufficiently prepared for trial.” He alleged that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Commission “assume[d] that [Bracey] deviated from his employment by leaving the bus to chase the passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2005-03-31
. The Commission “assume[d] that [Bracey] deviated from his employment by leaving the bus to chase the passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97649 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 82
to a ten-year determinate sentence. See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.201(2), 939.50(3)(d), 973.01(1) (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
to a ten-year determinate sentence. See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.201(2), 939.50(3)(d), 973.01(1) (1999-2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32302 - 2008-05-27
State v. Karen A.O.
these relationships. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10930 - 2005-03-31
these relationships. (d) The wishes of the child. (e) The duration of the separation of the parent from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10930 - 2005-03-31