Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29561 - 29570 of 51576 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

[PDF] State v. Bradley T. Turonie
to resentencing No. 2005AP2961-CR 2 because: (1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25761 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. The parties’ stipulation remains in effect. It, not estoppel, bars further litigation on the counterclaims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29755 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rule Order
matter without a public hearing. Wis. S. Ct. IOP III.A. Therefore, effective the date of this order
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137111 - 2017-09-21

State v. Douglas Parks
suspicion to effect an investigative stop, the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14146 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donnie L.B.
in effect, and it has never been executed against Donnie. It is an elementary rule of law that an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kaye M. Hughes v. Joseph Terry
The court concluded that the sheriff’s deed “was effective to convey legal title to the real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15675 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 96-01 SCR 20:8:5 - Jurisdiction in Disciplinary Proceedings
in the matter. IT IS ORDERED that, effective the date of this order, Supreme Court Rule 20:8.5
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1215 - 2017-09-19

State v. Shawn Schulpius
the case moot; and (3) the possible effect of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Seling v. Young
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2013-06-11

COURT OF APPEALS
. The parties’ stipulation remains in effect. It, not estoppel, bars further litigation on the counterclaims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29755 - 2007-07-18

Kenneth Jordan v. Stephen M. Puckett
have qualified under the rules in effect at the time of his conviction. We reject Jordan’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13098 - 2005-03-31