Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29561 - 29570 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 29561 - 29570 of 83389 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Brittany Frost v. Doreen Whitbeck
2001 WI App 289 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0327
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3579 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 289 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0327
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James Held
to a responsible adult. ¶5 Acknowledging that the case was a “close call,” the trial court ruled that Friedl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
to a responsible adult. ¶5 Acknowledging that the case was a “close call,” the trial court ruled that Friedl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2617 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly concluded that the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43493 - 2014-09-15
it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly concluded that the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43493 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 237
2006 WI App 237 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP68 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26641 - 2006-11-20
2006 WI App 237 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP68 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26641 - 2006-11-20
State v. Robert D. Stewart
, the State ultimately conceded that Stewart’s refusal was proper. The case was scheduled for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
, the State ultimately conceded that Stewart’s refusal was proper. The case was scheduled for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31
Certification
, the summary judgment material in this case was insufficient to support that determination. Jesica Mount
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66895 - 2011-06-29
, the summary judgment material in this case was insufficient to support that determination. Jesica Mount
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66895 - 2011-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Kevin J. Van Riper
2003 WI App 237 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0385-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6154 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 237 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0385-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6154 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
2003 WI App 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4990 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 28 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4990 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 124
2009 WI APP 124 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP2300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37734 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 124 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP2300
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
liability. Stanford argues that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case because public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21
liability. Stanford argues that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case because public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21