Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29561 - 29570 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 29561 - 29570 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
the case, alleging violations of the consumer act.[3] The circuit court determined Auto Cash violated Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46868 - 2010-02-08
the case, alleging violations of the consumer act.[3] The circuit court determined Auto Cash violated Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46868 - 2010-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
2001 WI App 215 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3390-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 215 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3390-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 177
2006 WI APP 177 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2003AP429
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26015 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 177 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2003AP429
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26015 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
situated for sentencing purposes: Staten’s codefendants had fewer prior convictions, fewer open cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
situated for sentencing purposes: Staten’s codefendants had fewer prior convictions, fewer open cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237273 - 2019-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
as a repeater. ¶4 Much of the State’s case hinged on Barr’s testimony. Barr recited a timeline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32290 - 2008-03-31
as a repeater. ¶4 Much of the State’s case hinged on Barr’s testimony. Barr recited a timeline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32290 - 2008-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly concluded that the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43493 - 2014-09-15
it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly concluded that the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43493 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
successfully petitioned to terminate the parental rights of C.H.’s father; his case is not before us and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742023 - 2023-12-19
successfully petitioned to terminate the parental rights of C.H.’s father; his case is not before us and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742023 - 2023-12-19
Whistle B. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2006 WI App 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP292 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20599 - 2006-01-24
2006 WI App 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP292 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20599 - 2006-01-24
2006 WI APP 237
2006 WI App 237 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP68 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26641 - 2012-11-20
2006 WI App 237 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP68 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26641 - 2012-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
liability. Stanford argues that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case because public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21
liability. Stanford argues that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case because public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21