Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29571 - 29580 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 29571 - 29580 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the secretary for that proposition does not contain any such blanket statement giving sole authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180630 - 2017-09-21
by the secretary for that proposition does not contain any such blanket statement giving sole authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
he argues contains statements that he believes contradict the contentions of the dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27041 - 2014-09-15
he argues contains statements that he believes contradict the contentions of the dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27041 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
the statutory time frame. This court considers the trial court's statement that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10272 - 2005-03-31
the statutory time frame. This court considers the trial court's statement that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10272 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon P. Cantwell
previous statement that the parties would be going immediately to sentencing if guilty verdicts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12984 - 2005-03-31
previous statement that the parties would be going immediately to sentencing if guilty verdicts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was scheduled to start. Boose had given the police an inculpatory statement, which the circuit court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
was scheduled to start. Boose had given the police an inculpatory statement, which the circuit court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
State v. William H. Jones
. Further, Jones did not dispute the two law enforcement officers’ statements that Jones was brought before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15086 - 2005-03-31
. Further, Jones did not dispute the two law enforcement officers’ statements that Jones was brought before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15086 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement that Kammeyer was known to carry a gun provided a justification for the stop because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91561 - 2014-09-15
statement that Kammeyer was known to carry a gun provided a justification for the stop because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91561 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement of the law governing these issues and properly applies the law to the facts. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140009 - 2017-09-21
statement of the law governing these issues and properly applies the law to the facts. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140009 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
waiver of his right not to testify, and opening statements/closing arguments—discloses no other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699367 - 2023-09-06
waiver of his right not to testify, and opening statements/closing arguments—discloses no other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699367 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to exercise her right not to testify, opening statements, and closing arguments—does not disclose any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994592 - 2025-08-13
to exercise her right not to testify, opening statements, and closing arguments—does not disclose any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994592 - 2025-08-13