Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29571 - 29580 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 29571 - 29580 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
federal sentence, rather than consecutively. He claimed the circuit court was not fully aware of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
federal sentence, rather than consecutively. He claimed the circuit court was not fully aware of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to these consolidated appeals. For purposes of Ramage’s claim for sentence credit, the facts comprising those histories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
to these consolidated appeals. For purposes of Ramage’s claim for sentence credit, the facts comprising those histories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90409 - 2012-12-10
State v. James F. Blasky
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.647[1] (2001-02).[2] He claims the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6642 - 2005-03-31
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and (5) whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and (5) whether there are intervening circumstances making it inequitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry E. Prust
Wis. Stat. ch. 980. ¶5 Prust’s first claim is that there was no proof that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5068 - 2005-03-31
Wis. Stat. ch. 980. ¶5 Prust’s first claim is that there was no proof that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
). Kelley claims the trial court erred in No. 2004AP1880-CR 2 denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
). Kelley claims the trial court erred in No. 2004AP1880-CR 2 denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Arlando Palmore
to a crime. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Palmore claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12977 - 2017-09-21
to a crime. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Palmore claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12977 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on his laptop, but he claimed that he did “not believe that [he] viewed any pornographic material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
on his laptop, but he claimed that he did “not believe that [he] viewed any pornographic material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” WISCONSIN STAT. § 909.015 sets forth examples of how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007417 - 2025-09-10
that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.” WISCONSIN STAT. § 909.015 sets forth examples of how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007417 - 2025-09-10
[PDF]
Arbor Vitae-Woodruff Joint School District No. 1 v. Gulf Insurance Company
under the contract.” Gulf contends that § 779.14(2), a statute of limitations, precludes the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3835 - 2017-09-20
under the contract.” Gulf contends that § 779.14(2), a statute of limitations, precludes the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3835 - 2017-09-20