Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 15245 for 2013.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 15245 for 2013.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Andritsch’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138503 - 2017-09-21
. Andritsch’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
this rule petition. On September 30, 2013, John F. Ebbott, then Executive Director of Legal Action
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218916 - 2018-09-07
this rule petition. On September 30, 2013, John F. Ebbott, then Executive Director of Legal Action
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218916 - 2018-09-07
CA Blank Order
that the judgment and order should be summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[2] The complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139014 - 2015-03-31
that the judgment and order should be summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[2] The complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139014 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146733 - 2017-09-21
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146733 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141956 - 2015-05-19
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141956 - 2015-05-19
CA Blank Order
a thorough no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137409 - 2015-03-17
a thorough no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137409 - 2015-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2013-14). 1 The State charged Waupekenay with second-degree sexual assault; burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140016 - 2017-09-21
809.21 (2013-14). 1 The State charged Waupekenay with second-degree sexual assault; burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140016 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
, pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brereton, 2013 WI 17, ¶¶25-30, 345 Wis. 2d 563, 826 N.W.2d 369. In State v. Miller, 2002 WI App 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129275 - 2017-09-21
. Brereton, 2013 WI 17, ¶¶25-30, 345 Wis. 2d 563, 826 N.W.2d 369. In State v. Miller, 2002 WI App 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159272 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159272 - 2017-09-21