Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 65973 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 65973 for motion to dismiss.
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel performed ineffectively by not pursuing a motion to dismiss based upon the lack of subject matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92811 - 2013-02-11
counsel performed ineffectively by not pursuing a motion to dismiss based upon the lack of subject matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92811 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
for severance and his motion to dismiss the tenth and eleventh counts of the information. Both issues were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
for severance and his motion to dismiss the tenth and eleventh counts of the information. Both issues were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Swanson brought a motion to dismiss all but counts one, eight and nine on the basis of insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214171 - 2018-06-12
, Swanson brought a motion to dismiss all but counts one, eight and nine on the basis of insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214171 - 2018-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 665, 849 N.W.2d 693. “A motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988301 - 2025-07-30
. 2d 665, 849 N.W.2d 693. “A motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988301 - 2025-07-30
Dane County v. Lee R.
.’s motion to dismiss after she called Dr. Von Riotte for testimony; (2) the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
.’s motion to dismiss after she called Dr. Von Riotte for testimony; (2) the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County v. Lee R.
erred in considering Lee R.’s motion to dismiss after she called Dr. Von Riotte for testimony; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13822 - 2014-09-15
erred in considering Lee R.’s motion to dismiss after she called Dr. Von Riotte for testimony; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13822 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
personally. The court denied the motion. Plath appealed, but voluntarily dismissed the appeal and settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117598 - 2014-09-15
personally. The court denied the motion. Plath appealed, but voluntarily dismissed the appeal and settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117598 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
personally. The court denied the motion. Plath appealed, but voluntarily dismissed the appeal and settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
personally. The court denied the motion. Plath appealed, but voluntarily dismissed the appeal and settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wayne R. Purdy v. Cap Gemini America, Inc.
granted Cap Gemini’s motion, dismissing Purdy’s action with prejudice. 3 The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3447 - 2017-09-19
granted Cap Gemini’s motion, dismissing Purdy’s action with prejudice. 3 The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3447 - 2017-09-19
Wayne R. Purdy v. Cap Gemini America, Inc.
preclusion. ¶5 The circuit court granted Cap Gemini’s motion, dismissing Purdy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3447 - 2005-03-31
preclusion. ¶5 The circuit court granted Cap Gemini’s motion, dismissing Purdy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3447 - 2005-03-31