Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 63537 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
. Finally, Richer argued he had been sentenced based on inaccurate information contained in the CCAP records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02

[PDF] Wm. R. Hubbell Steel Corporation v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company
that the summary judgment record does not support the appellants' claim that the construction project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7981 - 2017-09-19

07AP1728 Alan Dordel v. Arlyn W. Nofke
and complaint were filed.[1] The record does not demonstrate that when the court considered the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32948 - 2008-06-10

Terry J. Huffman v. Irvin Kroenke
statute is non-delegable as a matter of law. Because the record reveals disputed issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12658 - 2005-03-31

Julie A. Krombach v. James Neil Krombach
exercised if the court considers the facts of record, uses the proper legal standards, and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5580 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96920 - 2013-05-20

COURT OF APPEALS
’ Roll contributed to Rock n’ Roll’s financial problems. ¶4 The appellate record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62018 - 2011-03-28

Julie A. Krombach v. James Neil Krombach
exercised if the court considers the facts of record, uses the proper legal standards, and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5181 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115638 - 2014-06-30

[PDF] American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Darlene M. Tadych
and release with [her], and had already received payment on the same.” This court affirms. ¶2 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15586 - 2017-09-21