Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 20930 for word.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 20930 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged here is that you attempted to commit— THE DEFENDANT: Wording. I’m sorry, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
alleged here is that you attempted to commit— THE DEFENDANT: Wording. I’m sorry, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the words in the statute themselves, but also from the context in which they are used. Id. Further, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02
the words in the statute themselves, but also from the context in which they are used. Id. Further, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the return date; that the word “may” is permissive, not directory; and that Whitehead failed to provide any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273945 - 2020-07-30
by the return date; that the word “may” is permissive, not directory; and that Whitehead failed to provide any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273945 - 2020-07-30
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
the words “don’t know” next to these requests. The trial court deemed the requests admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
the words “don’t know” next to these requests. The trial court deemed the requests admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
in Gritzner v. Michael R., 228 Wis. 2d 541, 598 N.W.2d 282 (Ct. App. 1999). 5 “The use of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19
in Gritzner v. Michael R., 228 Wis. 2d 541, 598 N.W.2d 282 (Ct. App. 1999). 5 “The use of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thao Lor
was relevant to the element of soliciting. We agree. No. 98-0105-CR 7 word ‘or’ meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13519 - 2017-09-21
was relevant to the element of soliciting. We agree. No. 98-0105-CR 7 word ‘or’ meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13519 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ryan E. Baker
]he word ‘shall’ is presumed mandatory when it appears in a statute.” In re Commitment of Elizabeth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7347 - 2005-03-31
]he word ‘shall’ is presumed mandatory when it appears in a statute.” In re Commitment of Elizabeth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen P. Gautschi
or fundamental, we look to the purpose of the statute, not just its wording. See State v. Moline, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21
or fundamental, we look to the purpose of the statute, not just its wording. See State v. Moline, 170 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nancy M. White v. Jeffrey A. White
, noting that tax audits require more than “the word of the accountant and the person involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2897 - 2017-09-19
, noting that tax audits require more than “the word of the accountant and the person involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2897 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the usual sense of the word and that any payment Amidzich might have realized was offset by expenses Vent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65190 - 2011-05-31
in the usual sense of the word and that any payment Amidzich might have realized was offset by expenses Vent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65190 - 2011-05-31