Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 20931 for word.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 20931 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that the words “went to” and “attended” permit only a single inference, specifically, that Sheppard-Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208596 - 2018-02-20
, that the words “went to” and “attended” permit only a single inference, specifically, that Sheppard-Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208596 - 2018-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a description of how one is to properly apply for authorization, or a description of what binding words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
, a description of how one is to properly apply for authorization, or a description of what binding words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Herbert H. Timmerman
the broader word “any.” See id. We must construe all statutory words that are not technical according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8417 - 2017-09-19
the broader word “any.” See id. We must construe all statutory words that are not technical according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8417 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
stop our inquiry and apply the words chosen by the legislature. Id., ¶10. ¶12 Bulk disputes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29869 - 2014-09-15
stop our inquiry and apply the words chosen by the legislature. Id., ¶10. ¶12 Bulk disputes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29869 - 2014-09-15
State v. Herbert H. Timmerman
in the statute. Rather, the statute uses the broader word “any.” See id. We must construe all statutory words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8417 - 2005-03-31
in the statute. Rather, the statute uses the broader word “any.” See id. We must construe all statutory words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
the words “don’t know” next to these requests. The trial court deemed the requests admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
the words “don’t know” next to these requests. The trial court deemed the requests admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged here is that you attempted to commit— THE DEFENDANT: Wording. I’m sorry, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
alleged here is that you attempted to commit— THE DEFENDANT: Wording. I’m sorry, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
State v. Dale Marek
Allen meant by his use of the word.3 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13409 - 2017-09-21
Allen meant by his use of the word.3 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13409 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael F. Hupy & Associates v. Michael T. Savaglio
promise that Hupy was to “receive forty percent of the fee on the Hardison case” into words without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5002 - 2017-09-19
promise that Hupy was to “receive forty percent of the fee on the Hardison case” into words without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5002 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dale Marek
of the word.[3] On June 23, 1994, following the three-day trial, the jury convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13409 - 2011-11-29
of the word.[3] On June 23, 1994, following the three-day trial, the jury convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13409 - 2011-11-29