Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 20930 for word.
Search results 2961 - 2970 of 20930 for word.
State v. Ryan E. Baker
]he word ‘shall’ is presumed mandatory when it appears in a statute.” In re Commitment of Elizabeth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7346 - 2005-03-31
]he word ‘shall’ is presumed mandatory when it appears in a statute.” In re Commitment of Elizabeth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7346 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
inquiry and apply the words chosen by the legislature. Id., ¶10. ¶12 Bulk disputes the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29869 - 2007-07-30
inquiry and apply the words chosen by the legislature. Id., ¶10. ¶12 Bulk disputes the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29869 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
the words “don’t know” next to these requests. The trial court deemed the requests admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
the words “don’t know” next to these requests. The trial court deemed the requests admitted because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephen P. Gautschi
whether a defect is technical or fundamental, we look to the purpose of the statute, not just its wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16231 - 2005-03-31
whether a defect is technical or fundamental, we look to the purpose of the statute, not just its wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eric M. Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee
is universal that where ‘there is a power of attorney to do a particular act followed by general words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4279 - 2017-09-19
is universal that where ‘there is a power of attorney to do a particular act followed by general words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard, however, is a suggestion that we ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
standard, however, is a suggestion that we ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). In other words, § 48.356(2) requires any written order placing a child outside of the home, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142876 - 2015-06-08
). In other words, § 48.356(2) requires any written order placing a child outside of the home, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142876 - 2015-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged here is that you attempted to commit— THE DEFENDANT: Wording. I’m sorry, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
alleged here is that you attempted to commit— THE DEFENDANT: Wording. I’m sorry, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208602 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the words in the statute themselves, but also from the context in which they are used. Id. Further, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02
the words in the statute themselves, but also from the context in which they are used. Id. Further, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220313 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the return date; that the word “may” is permissive, not directory; and that Whitehead failed to provide any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273945 - 2020-07-30
by the return date; that the word “may” is permissive, not directory; and that Whitehead failed to provide any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273945 - 2020-07-30