Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29621 - 29630 of 97782 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29621 - 29630 of 97782 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
be dismissed with prejudice. At the same hearing at which the court accepted Bravick’s plea in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2005-03-31
be dismissed with prejudice. At the same hearing at which the court accepted Bravick’s plea in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 Counsel for USAO and SIST subsequently informed the circuit court that, because the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
. ¶9 Counsel for USAO and SIST subsequently informed the circuit court that, because the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93547 - 2013-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
), supports its position, but that case is inapposite. There, our supreme court was required to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121627 - 2014-09-15
), supports its position, but that case is inapposite. There, our supreme court was required to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121627 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31511 - 2008-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 15, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31511 - 2008-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
think a – any reason for me to keep Klein in the case at this point….” While this court reviews summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
think a – any reason for me to keep Klein in the case at this point….” While this court reviews summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31208 - 2007-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudice. The court found Starck was aware that the central issue in the case was the credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
prejudice. The court found Starck was aware that the central issue in the case was the credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of Taylor or the public for the circuit court with juvenile jurisdiction to hear the case. Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102299 - 2013-10-01
of Taylor or the public for the circuit court with juvenile jurisdiction to hear the case. Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102299 - 2013-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. Id., ¶44. The court approved as “sound” the reasoning of the pre-TIS case of Ashford v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44147 - 2009-12-07
sentence. Id., ¶44. The court approved as “sound” the reasoning of the pre-TIS case of Ashford v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44147 - 2009-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
When an appellate court decides an issue in a case, that decision becomes the law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30228 - 2007-09-10
When an appellate court decides an issue in a case, that decision becomes the law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30228 - 2007-09-10