Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29641 - 29650 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the denial by the Dane County circuit court of their motion to intervene in a suit brought by nonprofit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676596 - 2023-07-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that denied his motion for plea withdrawal, or, alternatively, resentencing. On appeal, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180511 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
§ 940.09(1)(a) (2005-06).1 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Kennedy argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95165 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07 (2017-18)2 motion for relief from that injunction. Gray argues: (1) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240580 - 2019-05-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Richard Burby appeals from an order of the circuit court denying his motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532084 - 2022-06-14

COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2005-06).[1] He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Kennedy argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95165 - 2013-04-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief without a hearing. Ross argues that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382251 - 2021-06-29

Habermehl Electric, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
into the contracts, Habermehl filed this action against DOT. The circuit court denied Habermehl’s motion to add DWD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5347 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
Prairie Farms’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the case with prejudice. Graham-Jackson appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992864 - 2025-08-07

[PDF] Habermehl Electric, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Habermehl’s motion to add DWD as a party and granted judgment in DOT’s favor, dismissing the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5347 - 2017-09-19