Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29651 - 29660 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29651 - 29660 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 25, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33118 - 2008-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 25, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33118 - 2008-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54232 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54232 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the allegations are in this case? JUROR: I don’t believe so. THE COURT: You think that you could sit here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118155 - 2014-07-28
the allegations are in this case? JUROR: I don’t believe so. THE COURT: You think that you could sit here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118155 - 2014-07-28
State v. John A. Scheiber
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE June 24, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14467 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE June 24, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14467 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE June 24, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE June 24, 1999 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reply brief that the circuit court should have permitted her to re-open the case so she could “subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2010-09-27
reply brief that the circuit court should have permitted her to re-open the case so she could “subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2010-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
case. By the Court.—Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109119 - 2014-03-17
case. By the Court.—Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109119 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
Joint jurisdiction courts
to operate as a Joint Jurisdictional Court. The existing Joint Jurisdictional Courts hear civil cases
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/jointjurisdictioncourts.pdf - 2023-11-09
to operate as a Joint Jurisdictional Court. The existing Joint Jurisdictional Courts hear civil cases
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/jointjurisdictioncourts.pdf - 2023-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case, in a prior court action concerning the assessor’s 2006 assessment of Lands’ End property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101878 - 2013-09-11
to this case, in a prior court action concerning the assessor’s 2006 assessment of Lands’ End property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101878 - 2013-09-11