Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29651 - 29660 of 97782 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29651 - 29660 of 97782 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 5, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49527 - 2010-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 5, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49527 - 2010-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35793 - 2009-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35793 - 2009-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31174 - 2007-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31174 - 2007-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to in which case I have to go back to the office and get additional paperwork. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31129 - 2007-12-11
to in which case I have to go back to the office and get additional paperwork. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31129 - 2007-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 37. In that case, our supreme court held summary judgment procedure is not permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111513 - 2014-05-05
.2d 37. In that case, our supreme court held summary judgment procedure is not permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111513 - 2014-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, the trial court erred in delaying the start of interest to the date the postverdict motions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
in this case, the trial court erred in delaying the start of interest to the date the postverdict motions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances of the Singerhouses’ case, the court determined it was appropriate to award sixty percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98830 - 2013-07-01
circumstances of the Singerhouses’ case, the court determined it was appropriate to award sixty percent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98830 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
to that of his co-defendant in the marijuana case. The trial court summarily denied the motion. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
to that of his co-defendant in the marijuana case. The trial court summarily denied the motion. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29781 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
that Buoscio attached to the complaint is fraudulent. The circuit court dismissed the case without prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147222 - 2015-08-30
that Buoscio attached to the complaint is fraudulent. The circuit court dismissed the case without prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147222 - 2015-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 4, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134231 - 2015-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 4, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134231 - 2015-02-03