Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29651 - 29660 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Michael G. Kinch
of trial counsel where counsel failed to advise him of his right to individually poll the jurors. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lance Terry Konrath
to vacate the seizure of his motor vehicle.[1] He now contends that the trial court erred when it issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10773 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony I. Santana
argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6522 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ahmad Abdullah
against unreasonable searches and seizures. The trial court denied the motion to suppress, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on inaccurate information or an improper factor; (4) whether Jordan received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515422 - 2022-05-04

[PDF] State v. Paul C. Thaiss
after searching their premises. Both pleaded guilty to the charges after the trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11174 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Bombardier, Inc. v. Applied Molded Products Corp.
the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment. ¶2 Applied Composites Holdings, LLC, owns AMP and AC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5001 - 2017-09-19

County of Rusk v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
contends that the trial court erred by dismissing its attempt to obtain certiorari review of the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13582 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient evidence to find probable cause to bind over Mary Dundon for trial on the charge of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31695 - 2008-02-05

State v. David R. Kaster
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.01. At trial, Kaster argued he was not “school staff” under § 948.095(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24626 - 2006-04-25