Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29661 - 29670 of 58510 for speedy trial.

State v. Nicholaas P.J. Ligtenberg
received effective assistance from trial counsel. We conclude that trial counsel did not effectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5919 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John R. Calkins
the 1995 conviction, claiming that the Walworth county trial court failed to conduct a colloquy with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6922 - 2017-09-20

State v. Corey J.G.
be proved beyond a reasonable doubt and is an issue to be established at trial regardless of where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11644 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frank Anastasi
information and that trial counsel performed ineffectively by failing to raise a competency issue. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7441 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or defect (NGI) were not properly withdrawn. He also complains that his trial counsel 3 failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192113 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 29, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 In the early morning hours of September 24, 2005, Nollenberg struck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41508 - 2009-09-28

[PDF] NOTICE
(2005-06), arguing that trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to specifically request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35943 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael G. Kinch
of trial counsel where counsel failed to advise him of his right to individually poll the jurors. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lance Terry Konrath
to vacate the seizure of his motor vehicle.[1] He now contends that the trial court erred when it issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10773 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dawn L. Bogumill
argues, as she did in the trial court, that § 343.44(2g)(c) is unconstitutional because it has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4624 - 2017-09-19