Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29671 - 29680 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29671 - 29680 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
2008 WI APP 136
HIGGINBOTHAM, P.J. The State appeals a circuit court order granting Sean R. Fox’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
HIGGINBOTHAM, P.J. The State appeals a circuit court order granting Sean R. Fox’s motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Ward
Attorney Ward to represent her in opposing a February 2001 motion filed in Milwaukee County by her former
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16721 - 2005-03-31
Attorney Ward to represent her in opposing a February 2001 motion filed in Milwaukee County by her former
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 139
2 The circuit court understood WEA Property’s motion for declaratory judgment in essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103910 - 2017-09-21
2 The circuit court understood WEA Property’s motion for declaratory judgment in essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
A. Franke heard the motions in limine and presided over the jury trial, sentencing, and the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34343 - 2014-09-15
A. Franke heard the motions in limine and presided over the jury trial, sentencing, and the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34343 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for plea withdrawal. Ruby contends that his no contest plea to first-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45543 - 2010-01-12
motion for plea withdrawal. Ruby contends that his no contest plea to first-degree sexual assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45543 - 2010-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the weapon, which he asserts was discovered during an illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40531 - 2009-09-08
challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the weapon, which he asserts was discovered during an illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40531 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
against PepsiCo in the amount of $1.26 billion. The court granted their motion on September 30, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80083 - 2012-04-01
against PepsiCo in the amount of $1.26 billion. The court granted their motion on September 30, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80083 - 2012-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion which alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel based upon trial counsel’s: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30754 - 2007-11-05
postconviction motion which alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel based upon trial counsel’s: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30754 - 2007-11-05
[PDF]
Keith K. Kost v. Neal Alan Zastrow
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Oneida County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Affirmed; motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7293 - 2017-09-20
. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court for Oneida County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Affirmed; motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7293 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92144 - 2013-01-28
motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92144 - 2013-01-28