Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29671 - 29680 of 37911 for d's.
Search results 29671 - 29680 of 37911 for d's.
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable view supports the verdict. State v. Quinsanna D., 2002 WI App 318, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 429, 655 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95074 - 2013-04-08
reasonable view supports the verdict. State v. Quinsanna D., 2002 WI App 318, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 429, 655 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95074 - 2013-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or other family members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these relationships. (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578854 - 2022-10-19
or other family members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these relationships. (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578854 - 2022-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to follow requirements that include WIS. STAT. § 809.19(1)(d) and (e) (2009-10). See State v. Pettit, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70384 - 2014-09-15
to follow requirements that include WIS. STAT. § 809.19(1)(d) and (e) (2009-10). See State v. Pettit, 171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
303.76(7)(d) provides that the warden’s decision on a disciplinary appeal “is final regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
303.76(7)(d) provides that the warden’s decision on a disciplinary appeal “is final regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to trial counsel’s performance because “[d]uring the pendency of this case, Mr. Wright defied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128232 - 2014-11-10
to a challenge to trial counsel’s performance because “[d]uring the pendency of this case, Mr. Wright defied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128232 - 2014-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS
that “both parties agree[d] to sole legal custody with the same party[,]” and the trial court approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101818 - 2013-09-17
that “both parties agree[d] to sole legal custody with the same party[,]” and the trial court approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101818 - 2013-09-17
Darla L. Gebhard v. Kelvin G. Gebhard
with the other remanded issues. We therefore remand for further consideration of this issue. D. Award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4437 - 2005-03-31
with the other remanded issues. We therefore remand for further consideration of this issue. D. Award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4437 - 2005-03-31
Certification
” or by a “preponderance of the evidence.” See United States v. Owens, 965 F. Supp. 158, 162-63 (D. Mass. 1997) (whether
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20
” or by a “preponderance of the evidence.” See United States v. Owens, 965 F. Supp. 158, 162-63 (D. Mass. 1997) (whether
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
Janice Renee Maxwell v. Jody Justin Maxwell
to discount the expressed wishes of the children was a proper exercise of discretion. Richard D. v. Rebecca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5460 - 2017-09-19
to discount the expressed wishes of the children was a proper exercise of discretion. Richard D. v. Rebecca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2017AP779-CRNM 2 §§ 961.41(1)(d)3, 961.41(1)(a) and (1x), and 946.49(1)(b) (2015-16). 1 East’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220431 - 2018-10-02
2017AP779-CRNM 2 §§ 961.41(1)(d)3, 961.41(1)(a) and (1x), and 946.49(1)(b) (2015-16). 1 East’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220431 - 2018-10-02