Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29671 - 29680 of 69114 for he.
Search results 29671 - 29680 of 69114 for he.
State v. Lorne Demars
Demars argues that he lacked proper notice of the repeater allegation and that the existence of the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31
Demars argues that he lacked proper notice of the repeater allegation and that the existence of the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lamont D. Tate
of crack cocaine out of her residence. Russell further attested that he interviewed CI #2, who told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31
of crack cocaine out of her residence. Russell further attested that he interviewed CI #2, who told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31
Laurie Van Cleef v. Mark Van Cleef
. Although Mark’s budget shows that he spends most of his $50,000 net income (or $4166 per month), the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6613 - 2005-03-31
. Although Mark’s budget shows that he spends most of his $50,000 net income (or $4166 per month), the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6613 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Baldocchi argues the court erred by concluding that he failed to satisfy his burden to show a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58071 - 2010-12-20
. Baldocchi argues the court erred by concluding that he failed to satisfy his burden to show a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58071 - 2010-12-20
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Hicks
. § 947.01 (2003-04). 2 He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18372 - 2017-09-21
. § 947.01 (2003-04). 2 He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18372 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
a[n] employee of the Department of Corrections.” He also asserts that, at issue, is the employee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
a[n] employee of the Department of Corrections.” He also asserts that, at issue, is the employee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas A. Logemann
as a third offense. He raises two challenges to his conviction. First, he contends that Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2912 - 2005-03-31
as a third offense. He raises two challenges to his conviction. First, he contends that Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2912 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of three of the four crimes he was charged with committing, second-degree sexual assault, misdemeanor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106405 - 2014-01-05
of three of the four crimes he was charged with committing, second-degree sexual assault, misdemeanor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106405 - 2014-01-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to overcome Escalona’s procedural bar by alleging that: [t]he court has not yet had much occasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16
to overcome Escalona’s procedural bar by alleging that: [t]he court has not yet had much occasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Shirley A. Kolve
. At the postconviction hearing David testified he overheard Mary coach her sister on what happened during the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2919 - 2017-09-19
. At the postconviction hearing David testified he overheard Mary coach her sister on what happened during the incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2919 - 2017-09-19