Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29681 - 29690 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29681 - 29690 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
In Marinez, another case involving sexual assault of a child, the circuit court gave a similar cautionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74264 - 2011-11-22
In Marinez, another case involving sexual assault of a child, the circuit court gave a similar cautionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74264 - 2011-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54232 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54232 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the allegations are in this case? JUROR: I don’t believe so. THE COURT: You think that you could sit here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118155 - 2014-07-28
the allegations are in this case? JUROR: I don’t believe so. THE COURT: You think that you could sit here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118155 - 2014-07-28
Milwaukee County v. Louise M.
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16984 - 2005-03-31
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16984 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16985 - 2005-03-31
. STEINMETZ, J. The issue in this case is whether the circuit court has the authority to review probable
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16985 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reply brief that the circuit court should have permitted her to re-open the case so she could “subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2010-09-27
reply brief that the circuit court should have permitted her to re-open the case so she could “subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2010-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
. Huss argues the circuit court erred in both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
to the assertion made to this court, we conclude: (1) Shannon’s case was not “distinct” from that of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4232 - 2017-09-19
to the assertion made to this court, we conclude: (1) Shannon’s case was not “distinct” from that of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4232 - 2017-09-19
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
; the procedural status of the case leading up to the appeal; the disposition in the trial court; and a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4232 - 2005-03-31
; the procedural status of the case leading up to the appeal; the disposition in the trial court; and a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4232 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
case. By the Court.—Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109119 - 2014-03-17
case. By the Court.—Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109119 - 2014-03-17