Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29681 - 29690 of 97795 for civil court case status online.

COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred when it dismissed the petitions during the case-in-chief because the court incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43493 - 2009-11-10

COURT OF APPEALS
, nor the Locke case compels such a conclusion. See Locke, 177 Wis. 2d at 597 (a court may not deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33051 - 2008-06-16

COURT OF APPEALS
to produce all of the DNA evidence relevant to his case. The circuit court denied the petition because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31930 - 2008-02-25

COURT OF APPEALS
would play a significant role in this case. By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30573 - 2007-10-10

COURT OF APPEALS
court held a trial on December 9, 2013. At the close of Hoague’s case, Kraft moved for a directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138824 - 2015-04-01

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 1, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70345 - 2011-08-31

State v. Terry Penny
statue, § 971.10(3), Stats., which reads: “A court may grant a continuance in a case … if the ends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12967 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Terry Penny
is allowable in this case under the speedy trial statue, § 971.10(3), STATS., which reads: “A court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12967 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 72
2008 WI 72 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP1379-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33225 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
2008 WI 72 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP1379-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33225 - 2008-06-25