Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 11824 for affidavit.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 11824 for affidavit.
COURT OF APPEALS
not consider whether Matthew Kosek’s affidavit, that he did not receive any report from the Hanauskas’ engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
not consider whether Matthew Kosek’s affidavit, that he did not receive any report from the Hanauskas’ engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
Michael Wendt v. John H. Blazek
in these conveyances. ¶3 According to the affidavit of William Jaeckle, a son of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3007 - 2005-03-31
in these conveyances. ¶3 According to the affidavit of William Jaeckle, a son of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3007 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
plea. We agree. Attached to the report is appellate counsel’s affidavit outlining his conversations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02
plea. We agree. Attached to the report is appellate counsel’s affidavit outlining his conversations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
that she was there to serve legal process. The assistant did not prepare an affidavit of service and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
that she was there to serve legal process. The assistant did not prepare an affidavit of service and could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
[PDF]
Robert Hoskins v. Dodge County
asserting a dispute of material fact, Hoskins cites two affidavits he submitted in opposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3773 - 2017-09-19
asserting a dispute of material fact, Hoskins cites two affidavits he submitted in opposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3773 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jackson County v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
, and a correction affidavit was recorded in Volume 423 at page 825 as document number 314134; and Whereas
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25863 - 2017-09-21
, and a correction affidavit was recorded in Volume 423 at page 825 as document number 314134; and Whereas
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25863 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
placed from Burris’s home phone to the phone of her friend at 5:31 p.m. and 6:25 p.m.; affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
placed from Burris’s home phone to the phone of her friend at 5:31 p.m. and 6:25 p.m.; affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
Mark Garber v. Fidelis Omegbu
on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25630 - 2017-09-21
on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as required by § 893.82. ¶6 In support of his motion to dismiss, Switalla submitted an affidavit of Betty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21
as required by § 893.82. ¶6 In support of his motion to dismiss, Switalla submitted an affidavit of Betty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29