Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 18714 for quote.
CA Blank Order
for the sentence.’” State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶28, 347 Wis. 2d 142, 832 N.W.2d 491 (quoted source omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112892 - 2014-05-20
for the sentence.’” State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38, ¶28, 347 Wis. 2d 142, 832 N.W.2d 491 (quoted source omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112892 - 2014-05-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael K. Evans
for each day imposed. See id., 282 Wis. 2d 522, ¶17 (citing and quoting Birts v. State, 68 Wis. 2d 389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26204 - 2017-09-21
for each day imposed. See id., 282 Wis. 2d 522, ¶17 (citing and quoting Birts v. State, 68 Wis. 2d 389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26204 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
.’” State v. Stuart, 2003 WI 73, ¶23, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W.2d 82 (quoted source omitted). We therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109460 - 2014-03-19
.’” State v. Stuart, 2003 WI 73, ¶23, 262 Wis. 2d 620, 664 N.W.2d 82 (quoted source omitted). We therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109460 - 2014-03-19
State v. Randy L. Barreau
no reasonable objection to the blood draw. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199 at ¶7, quoting Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16242 - 2005-03-31
no reasonable objection to the blood draw. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199 at ¶7, quoting Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16242 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Conrad Goehl
with the above- quoted administrative rule satisfies the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10988 - 2017-09-19
with the above- quoted administrative rule satisfies the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10988 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gilbert J. Grobstick
is no defense to the crime of escape. Wis J I--Criminal 1772 n.4 (quoting Judiciary [1] The State
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7845 - 2005-03-31
is no defense to the crime of escape. Wis J I--Criminal 1772 n.4 (quoting Judiciary [1] The State
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7845 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Frank
no reasonable objection to the blood draw. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199 at ¶7, quoting Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
no reasonable objection to the blood draw. Thorstad, 2000 WI App 199 at ¶7, quoting Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald Harris
N.W.2d 12 (quoting State ex rel. Haas v. McReynolds, 2002 WI 43, ¶14, 252 Wis. 2d 133, 643 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7537 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 12 (quoting State ex rel. Haas v. McReynolds, 2002 WI 43, ¶14, 252 Wis. 2d 133, 643 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7537 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
. Howes, 2017 WI 18, ¶17, 373 Wis. 2d 468, 893 N.W.2d 812 (quoted source omitted). “First, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
. Howes, 2017 WI 18, ¶17, 373 Wis. 2d 468, 893 N.W.2d 812 (quoted source omitted). “First, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752844 - 2024-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
acting as the trier of fact.’” Young, 2009 WI App 22, ¶17, ___ Wis. 2d at ___, 762 N.W.2d at 741 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37534 - 2009-07-13
acting as the trier of fact.’” Young, 2009 WI App 22, ¶17, ___ Wis. 2d at ___, 762 N.W.2d at 741 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37534 - 2009-07-13